* Since POSIX gives you only error or success on calls its difficult to determine the proper behavior when applying the behavior to multiple targets. Generally if something succeeds when reading it returns the data it can. If something fails when making an action we continue on and return the last error.
* Since POSIX gives you only error or success on calls its difficult to determine the proper behavior when applying the behavior to multiple targets. Generally if something succeeds when reading it returns the data it can. If something fails when making an action we continue on and return the last error.
* The recommended options are **defaults,allow_other**. The **allow_other** is to allow users who are not the one which executed mergerfs access to the mountpoint. **defaults** is described above and should offer the best performance. It's possible that if you're running on an older platform the **splice** features aren't available and could error. In that case simply use the other options manually.
* The recommended options are **defaults,allow_other**. The **allow_other** is to allow users who are not the one which executed mergerfs access to the mountpoint. **defaults** is described above and should offer the best performance. It's possible that if you're running on an older platform the **splice** features aren't available and could error. In that case simply use the other options manually.
* Remember that some policies mixed with some functions may result in strange behaviors. Not that some of these behaviors and race conditions couldn't happen outside **mergerfs** but that they are far more likely to occur on account of attempt to merge together multiple sources of data which could be out of sync due to the different policies.
* Remember that some policies mixed with some functions may result in strange behaviors. Not that some of these behaviors and race conditions couldn't happen outside **mergerfs** but that they are far more likely to occur on account of attempt to merge together multiple sources of data which could be out of sync due to the different policies.
* An example: [Kodi](http://kodi.tv) can apparently use directory [mtime](http://linux.die.net/man/2/stat) to more efficiently determine whether or not to scan for new content rather than simply performing a full scan. If using the current default **getattr** policy of **ff** its possible **Kodi** will miss an update on account of it returning the first directory found's **stat** info and its a later directory on another mount which had the **mtime** recently updated. To fix this you will want to set **func.getattr=newest**. Remember though that this is just **stat**. If the file is later **open**'ed or **unlink**'ed and the policy is different for those then a completely different file or directory could be acted on.
* An example: [Kodi](http://kodi.tv) and [Plex](http://plex.tv) can apparently use directory [mtime](http://linux.die.net/man/2/stat) to more efficiently determine whether or not to scan for new content rather than simply performing a full scan. If using the current default **getattr** policy of **ff** its possible **Kodi** will miss an update on account of it returning the first directory found's **stat** info and its a later directory on another mount which had the **mtime** recently updated. To fix this you will want to set **func.getattr=newest**. Remember though that this is just **stat**. If the file is later **open**'ed or **unlink**'ed and the policy is different for those then a completely different file or directory could be acted on.
* Due to previously mentioned issues its generally best to set **category** wide policies rather than individual **func**'s. This will help limit the confusion of tools such as [rsync](http://linux.die.net/man/1/rsync).
* Due to previously mentioned issues its generally best to set **category** wide policies rather than individual **func**'s. This will help limit the confusion of tools such as [rsync](http://linux.die.net/man/1/rsync).
# Known Issues / Bugs
# Known Issues / Bugs
* Performing an [initgroups](http://linux.die.net/man/3/initgroups) or [setgroups](http://linux.die.net/man/2/setgroups) for every call (see below) would be relatively expensive and currently not [done](https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs/issues/88). Some caching system will need to be created to limit calls to [getgroups](http://linux.die.net/man/2/getgroups) and [getpwuid_r](http://linux.die.net/man/3/getpwuid_r). Until that's done if a file / directory set to be accessable only by a group may not work if the primary group of the user making the call is not used. Limiting the switching of IDs is also in the works which will help as well.
* Due to the overhead of [getgroups/setgroups](http://linux.die.net/man/2/setgroups) mergerfs utilizes a cache. This cache is opportunistic and per thread. This means each thread will query the supplemental groups for a user when that particular thread needs to change credentials and currently it will keep that data for the lifetime of the mount or thread. This means that if a user is added to a group it may not be picked up without the restart of mergerfs. However, since the high level FUSE API's (at least the standard version) thread pool dynamically grows and shrinks it's possible that over time a thread will be killed and later a new thread with no cache will start and query the new data.
# FAQ
# FAQ
@ -264,10 +266,12 @@ A B C
If you are familiar with POSIX standards you'll know that this behavior poses a problem. **seteuid** and **setegid** affect the whole process and **libfuse** is multithreaded by default. We'd need to lock access to **seteuid** and **setegid** with a mutex so that the several threads aren't stepping on one another and files end up with weird permissions and ownership. This however wouldn't scale well. With lots of calls the contention on that mutex would be extremely high. Thankfully on Linux and OSX we have a better solution.
If you are familiar with POSIX standards you'll know that this behavior poses a problem. **seteuid** and **setegid** affect the whole process and **libfuse** is multithreaded by default. We'd need to lock access to **seteuid** and **setegid** with a mutex so that the several threads aren't stepping on one another and files end up with weird permissions and ownership. This however wouldn't scale well. With lots of calls the contention on that mutex would be extremely high. Thankfully on Linux and OSX we have a better solution.
OSX has a [non-portable pthread extension](https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man2/pthread_setugid_np.2.html) for per-thread user and group impersonation. When building on OSX mergerfs will use this without any mutexes.
OSX has a [non-portable pthread extension](https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man2/pthread_setugid_np.2.html) for per-thread user and group impersonation.
Linux does not support [pthread_setugid_np](https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man2/pthread_setugid_np.2.html) but user and group IDs are a per-thread attribute though documentation on that fact or how to manipulate them is not well distributed. From the **4.00** release of the Linux man-pages project for [setuid](http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/setuid.2.html)
Linux does not support [pthread_setugid_np](https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man2/pthread_setugid_np.2.html) but user and group IDs are a per-thread attribute though documentation on that fact or how to manipulate them is not well distributed. From the **4.00** release of the Linux man-pages project for [setuid](http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/setuid.2.html)
> At the kernel level, user IDs and group IDs are a per-thread attribute. However, POSIX requires that all threads in a process share the same credentials. The NPTL threading implementation handles the POSIX requirements by providing wrapper functions for the various system calls that change process UIDs and GIDs. These wrapper functions (including the one for setuid()) employ a signal-based technique to ensure that when one thread changes credentials, all of the other threads in the process also change their credentials. For details, see nptl(7).
> At the kernel level, user IDs and group IDs are a per-thread attribute. However, POSIX requires that all threads in a process share the same credentials. The NPTL threading implementation handles the POSIX requirements by providing wrapper functions for the various system calls that change process UIDs and GIDs. These wrapper functions (including the one for setuid()) employ a signal-based technique to ensure that when one thread changes credentials, all of the other threads in the process also change their credentials. For details, see nptl(7).
Turns out the setreuid syscalls apply only to the thread. GLIBC hides this away using RT signals and other tricks. Taking after **Samba** mergerfs uses **syscall(SYS_setreuid,...)** to set the callers credentials for that thread only. Jumping back to **root** as necessary should escalated privileges be needed (for instance: to clone paths).
Turns out the setreuid syscalls apply only to the thread. GLIBC hides this away using RT signals to inform all threads to change credentials. Taking after **Samba** mergerfs uses **syscall(SYS_setreuid,...)** to set the callers credentials for that thread only. Jumping back to **root** as necessary should escalated privileges be needed (for instance: to clone paths).
For non-Linux systems mergerfs uses a read-write lock and changes credentials only when necessary. If multiple threads are to be user X then only the first one will need to change the processes credentials. So long as the other threads need to be user X they will take a readlock allow multiple threads to share the credentials. Once a request comes in to run as user Y that thread will attempt a write lock and change to Y's credentials when it can. If the ability to give writers priority is supported then that flag will be used so threads trying to change credentials don't starve. This isn't the best solution but should work reasonably well. As new platforms are supported if they offer per thread credentials those APIs will be adopted.
Antonio SJ Musumeci
9 years ago