* compare chunks by timestamp
* fix slab clearing error
* fix test compilation
* move oldest chunk to sealed, instead of by fullness
* lock on fh.entryViewCache
* remove verbose logs
* revert slat clearing
* less logs
* less logs
* track write and read by timestamp
* remove useless logic
* add entry lock on file handle release
* use mem chunk only, swap file chunk has problems
* comment out code that maybe used later
* add debug mode to compare data read and write
* more efficient readResolvedChunks with linked list
* small optimization
* fix test compilation
* minor fix on writer
* add SeparateGarbageChunks
* group chunks into sections
* turn off debug mode
* fix tests
* fix tests
* tmp enable swap file chunk
* Revert "tmp enable swap file chunk"
This reverts commit 985137ec47.
* simple refactoring
* simple refactoring
* do not re-use swap file chunk. Sealed chunks should not be re-used.
* comment out debugging facilities
* either mem chunk or swap file chunk is fine now
* remove orderedMutex as *semaphore.Weighted
not found impactful
* optimize size calculation for changing large files
* optimize performance to avoid going through the long list of chunks
* still problems with swap file chunk
* rename
* tiny optimization
* swap file chunk save only successfully read data
* fix
* enable both mem and swap file chunk
* resolve chunks with range
* rename
* fix chunk interval list
* also change file handle chunk group when adding chunks
* pick in-active chunk with time-decayed counter
* fix compilation
* avoid nil with empty fh.entry
* refactoring
* rename
* rename
* refactor visible intervals to *list.List
* refactor chunkViews to *list.List
* add IntervalList for generic interval list
* change visible interval to use IntervalList in generics
* cahnge chunkViews to *IntervalList[*ChunkView]
* use NewFileChunkSection to create
* rename variables
* refactor
* fix renaming leftover
* renaming
* renaming
* add insert interval
* interval list adds lock
* incrementally add chunks to readers
Fixes:
1. set start and stop offset for the value object
2. clone the value object
3. use pointer instead of copy-by-value when passing to interval.Value
4. use insert interval since adding chunk could be out of order
* fix tests compilation
* fix tests compilation
Run two servers with volumes and fillers:
server -dir=Server1alpha -master.port=11000 -filer -filer.port=11001 -volume.port=11002
server -dir=Server1sigma -master.port=11006 -filer -filer.port=11007 -volume.port=11008
Run Active-Passive filler.sync:
filer.sync -a localhost:11007 -b localhost:11001 -isActivePassive
Upload file to 11007 port:
curl -F file=@/Desktop/9.xml "http://localhost:11007/testFacebook/"
If we request a file on two servers now, everything will be correct, even if we add data to the file and upload it again:
curl "http://localhost:11007/testFacebook/9.xml"
EQUALS
curl "http://localhost:11001/testFacebook/9.xml"
However, if we change the already existing data in the file (for example, we change the first line in the file, reducing its length), then this file on the second server will not be valid and will not be equivalent to the first file
Снимок экрана 2022-02-07 в 14 21 11
This problem occurs on line 202 in the filer_sink.go file. In particular, this is due to incorrect mapping of chunk names in the DoMinusChunks function. The names of deletedChunks do not match the chunks of existingEntry.Chunks, since the first chunks come from another server and have a different addressing (name) compared to the addressing on the server where the file is being overwritten.
Deleted chunks are not actually deleted on the server to which the file is replicated.
* adjust isOpen count
* move ContinuousDirtyPages lock to filehandle
* fix problem with MergeIntoVisibles, avoid reusing slices
* let filer delete the garbage
chrislu
Chris Lu
aronneagu
geekboood
justin
Konstantin Lebedev
j.laycock