@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ GlusterFS hashes the path and filename into ids, and assigned to virtual volumes
Ceph can be setup similar to SeaweedFS as a key->blob store. It is much more complicated, with the need to support layers on top of it. [Here is a more detailed comparison](https://github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/issues/120)
Ceph can be setup similar to SeaweedFS as a key->blob store. It is much more complicated, with the need to support layers on top of it. [Here is a more detailed comparison](https://github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/issues/120)
SeaweedFS has a centralized master group to look up free volumes, while Ceph uses hashing and metadata servers to locate its objects. Having a centralized master makes it easy to code and manage.
SeaweedFS has a centralized master group to look up free volumes, while Ceph uses hashing and metadata servers to locate its objects. Having a centralized master makes it easy to code and manage.
Same as SeaweedFS, Ceph is also based on the object store RADOS. Ceph is rather complicated with mixed reviews.
Same as SeaweedFS, Ceph is also based on the object store RADOS. Ceph is rather complicated with mixed reviews.
@ -388,6 +388,12 @@ Other key features include: Erasure Encoding, JWT security.
This is a super exciting project! And we need helpers and [support](https://www.patreon.com/seaweedfs)!
This is a super exciting project! And we need helpers and [support](https://www.patreon.com/seaweedfs)!
BTW, We suggest run the code style check script `util/gostd` before you push your branch to remote, it will make SeaweedFS easy to review, maintain and develop: