From 179bcb777ecc9aadd244ae6771ae11147b5df799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: chrislu Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 17:34:03 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Delete ec_vacuum_integration_test.go --- .../ec_vacuum/ec_vacuum_integration_test.go | 31 ------------------- 1 file changed, 31 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 weed/worker/tasks/ec_vacuum/ec_vacuum_integration_test.go diff --git a/weed/worker/tasks/ec_vacuum/ec_vacuum_integration_test.go b/weed/worker/tasks/ec_vacuum/ec_vacuum_integration_test.go deleted file mode 100644 index 72aa20768..000000000 --- a/weed/worker/tasks/ec_vacuum/ec_vacuum_integration_test.go +++ /dev/null @@ -1,31 +0,0 @@ -package ec_vacuum - -import ( - "testing" - - "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" -) - -// TestECVacuumGenerationZeroDowntime is a placeholder for integration testing -// This test would require a full SeaweedFS cluster setup and is better suited -// for end-to-end testing in a real environment -func TestECVacuumGenerationZeroDowntime(t *testing.T) { - // This test validates the conceptual zero-downtime approach - // In a real integration test, this would: - // 1. Start a SeaweedFS cluster with multiple volume servers - // 2. Create EC volumes with test data - // 3. Start continuous read workload - // 4. Trigger EC vacuum with generation transition - // 5. Verify reads continue with zero downtime - // 6. Validate generation cleanup after grace period - - t.Logf("✅ EC Vacuum Generation Zero Downtime Test Framework:") - t.Logf(" - Would test continuous reads during vacuum") - t.Logf(" - Would verify generation G→G+1 transition") - t.Logf(" - Would validate atomic activation") - t.Logf(" - Would test cleanup grace period") - t.Logf(" - Would ensure zero service interruption") - - // For now, we rely on the unit tests to validate the core logic - assert.True(t, true, "Integration test framework ready") -}