3.2 KiB
Usage and Functionality
Can mergerfs be used with filesystems which already have data?
Yes. mergerfs is really just a proxy and does NOT interfere with the normal form or function of the filesystems, mounts, or paths it manages. It literally is interacting with your filesystems as any other application does. It can not do anything that any other random piece of software can't do.
mergerfs is not a traditional filesystem that takes control over the underlying disk or block device. mergerfs is not RAID. It does not manipulate the data that passes through it. It does not shard data across filesystems. It only shards some behavior and aggregates others.
Can filesystems be removed from the pool without affecting them?
Yes. See previous question's answer.
Can mergerfs be removed without affecting the data?
Yes. See the previous question's answer.
Can filesystems be moved to another pool?
Yes. See the previous question's answer.
Can filesystems be part of multiple pools?
Yes.
How do I migrate data into or out of the pool when adding/removing filesystems?
There is no need to do so. See the previous questions.
How do I remove a filesystem but keep the data in the pool?
Nothing special needs to be done. Remove the branch from mergerfs' config and copy (rsync) the data from the removed filesystem into the pool. The same as if it were you transferring data from one filesystem to another.
If you wish to continue using the pool with all data available while
performing the transfer simply create a temporary pool without the
branch in question and then copy the data from the branch to the
temporary pool. It would probably be a good idea to set the branch
mode to RO prior to doing this to ensure no new content is written
to the filesystem while performing the copy. However, it is typically
good practice to run rsync or rclone again after the first copy
finishes to ensure nothing is left behind.
NOTE: Above recommends to "copy" rather than "move" because you want to ensure that your data is transferred before wiping the drive or filesystem.
Can filesystems still be used directly? Outside of mergerfs while pooled?
Yes, out-of-band
interaction is generally fine. Remember that mergerfs is a userland
application so any interaction with the underlying filesystem is the
same as multiple normal applications interacting. However, it is not
recommended to write to the same file from within the pool and from
without at the same time. Especially if using page caching
(cache.files!=off) or writeback caching
(cache.writeback=true). That said this risk is really not different
from the risk of two applications writing to the same file under
normal conditions.
Keep in mind that if out-of-band changes are made while also
leveraging any caching of the filesystem layout such as with
cache.entry, cache.negative_entry, cache.attr, cache.symlinks,
or cache.readdir you may experience temporary inconsistency till the
cache expires. mergerfs is not actively watching all branches for
changes and the kernel will have no way to know anything changed so as
to clear or ignore the cache. This is the same issue you can have with
remote filesystems.