From 58ab7f7fa867c1519ef6eea53b36879d1bedee5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergio Kef Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 22:32:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 274bbb6a..5d000177 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ While aufs can offer better peak performance mergerfs provides more configurabil #### Why use mergerfs over unionfs? -UnionFS is more like aufs then mergerfs in that it offers overlay / CoW features. If you're just looking to create a union of drives and want flexibility in file/directory placement then mergerfs offers that whereas unionfs is more for overlaying RW filesystems over RO ones. +UnionFS is more like aufs than mergerfs in that it offers overlay / CoW features. If you're just looking to create a union of drives and want flexibility in file/directory placement then mergerfs offers that whereas unionfs is more for overlaying RW filesystems over RO ones. #### Why use mergerfs over LVM/ZFS/BTRFS/RAID0 drive concatenation / striping?