|
|
@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ covering different usecases. |
|
|
|
32bit versions are provided as there is some software which does not |
|
|
|
handle 64bit inodes well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While there is a risk of hash collision in tests of a couple million |
|
|
|
While there is a risk of hash collision in tests of a couple of million |
|
|
|
entries there were zero collisions. Unlike a typical filesystem FUSE |
|
|
|
filesystems can reuse inodes and not refer to the same entry. The |
|
|
|
internal identifier used to reference a file in FUSE is different from |
|
|
@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ should always be managing inode values. |
|
|
|
### pin-threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simple strategies for pinning read and/or process threads. If process |
|
|
|
threads are not enabled than the strategy simply works on the read |
|
|
|
threads are not enabled then the strategy simply works on the read |
|
|
|
threads. Invalid values are ignored. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* R1L: All read threads pinned to a single logical CPU. |
|
|
@ -507,15 +507,15 @@ threads. Invalid values are ignored. |
|
|
|
* RPSL: All read and process threads are spread across all logical CPUs. |
|
|
|
* RPSP: All read and process threads are spread across all physical CPUs. |
|
|
|
* R1PPSP: All read threads are pinned to a single physical CPU while |
|
|
|
process threads are spread across all other phsycial CPUs. |
|
|
|
process threads are spread across all other physical CPUs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### fuse_msg_size |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FUSE applications communicate with the kernel over a special character |
|
|
|
device: `/dev/fuse`. A large portion of the overhead associated with |
|
|
|
FUSE is the cost of going back and forth from user space and kernel |
|
|
|
space over that device. Generally speaking the fewer trips needed the |
|
|
|
FUSE is the cost of going back and forth between user space and kernel |
|
|
|
space over that device. Generally speaking, the fewer trips needed the |
|
|
|
better the performance will be. Reducing the number of trips can be |
|
|
|
done a number of ways. Kernel level caching and increasing message |
|
|
|
sizes being two significant ones. When it comes to reads and writes if |
|
|
@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ max message size. Since the size is in multiples of |
|
|
|
[pages](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_(computer_memory)) the |
|
|
|
feature is called `max_pages`. There is a maximum `max_pages` value of |
|
|
|
256 (1MiB) and minimum of 1 (4KiB). The default used by Linux >=4.20, |
|
|
|
and hardcoded value used before 4.20, is 32 (128KiB). In mergerfs its |
|
|
|
and hardcoded value used before 4.20, is 32 (128KiB). In mergerfs it's |
|
|
|
referred to as `fuse_msg_size` to make it clear what it impacts and |
|
|
|
provide some abstraction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -573,11 +573,11 @@ the `newpath`. The `target` value is determined by the value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* passthrough: Return EXDEV as normal. |
|
|
|
* rel-symlink: A relative path from the `newpath`. |
|
|
|
* abs-base-symlink: A absolute value using the underlying branch. |
|
|
|
* abs-pool-symlink: A absolute value using the mergerfs mount point. |
|
|
|
* abs-base-symlink: An absolute value using the underlying branch. |
|
|
|
* abs-pool-symlink: An absolute value using the mergerfs mount point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: It is possible that some applications check the file they |
|
|
|
link. In those cases it is possible it will error or complain. |
|
|
|
link. In those cases, it is possible it will error or complain. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### rename-exdev |
|
|
@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ The `target` value is determined by the value of `rename-exdev`. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* passthrough: Return EXDEV as normal. |
|
|
|
* rel-symlink: A relative path from the `newpath`. |
|
|
|
* abs-symlink: A absolute value using the mergerfs mount point. |
|
|
|
* abs-symlink: An absolute value using the mergerfs mount point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: It is possible that some applications check the file they |
|
|
|
rename. In those cases it is possible it will error or complain. |
|
|
@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ something to keep in mind. |
|
|
|
the target of a symlink. If using this feature it will be necessary to |
|
|
|
point any backup software to the original filesystems or configure the |
|
|
|
software to follow symlinks if such an option is available. |
|
|
|
Alternatively create two mounts. One for backup and one for general |
|
|
|
Alternatively, create two mounts. One for backup and one for general |
|
|
|
consumption. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -683,16 +683,16 @@ writable. |
|
|
|
Even though it's a more niche situation this hack breaks normal |
|
|
|
security and behavior and as such is `off` by default. If set to `git` |
|
|
|
it will only perform the hack when the path in question includes |
|
|
|
`/.git/`. `all` will result it applying anytime a read-only file which |
|
|
|
`/.git/`. `all` will result in it applying anytime a read-only file which |
|
|
|
is empty is opened for writing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### export-support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In theory this flag should not be exposed to the end user. It is a |
|
|
|
In theory, this flag should not be exposed to the end user. It is a |
|
|
|
low-level FUSE flag which indicates whether or not the kernel can send |
|
|
|
certain kinds of messages to it for the purposes of using with |
|
|
|
NFS. mergerfs does support these messages but due bugs and quirks |
|
|
|
certain kinds of messages to it for the purposes of using it with |
|
|
|
NFS. mergerfs does support these messages but due to bugs and quirks |
|
|
|
found in the kernel and mergerfs this option is provided just in case |
|
|
|
it is needed for debugging. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ initiated it is not possible to change during run time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The POSIX filesystem API is made up of a number of |
|
|
|
functions. **creat**, **stat**, **chown**, etc. For ease of |
|
|
|
configuration in mergerfs most of the core functions are grouped into |
|
|
|
configuration in mergerfs, most of the core functions are grouped into |
|
|
|
3 categories: **action**, **create**, and **search**. These functions |
|
|
|
and categories can be assigned a policy which dictates which branch is |
|
|
|
chosen when performing that function. |
|
|
@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ device) depending on the most recent reason for filtering a |
|
|
|
branch. **ENOENT** will be returned if no eligible branch is found. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If **create**, **mkdir**, **mknod**, or **symlink** fail with `EROFS` |
|
|
|
or other fundimental errors then mergerfs will mark any branch found |
|
|
|
or other fundamental errors then mergerfs will mark any branch found |
|
|
|
to be read-only as such (IE will set the mode `RO`) and will rerun the |
|
|
|
policy and try again. This is mostly for `ext4` filesystems that can |
|
|
|
suddenly become read-only when it encounters an error. |
|
|
@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ work while still obeying mergerfs' policies. Below is the basic logic. |
|
|
|
* Remove the target from all branches with no source file |
|
|
|
* Remove the source from all branches which failed to rename |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The the removals are subject to normal entitlement checks. |
|
|
|
The removals are subject to normal entitlement checks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above behavior will help minimize the likelihood of EXDEV being |
|
|
|
returned but it will still be possible. |
|
|
@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ The options `statfs` and `statfs_ignore` can be used to modify |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20211024132607.1636952-1-amir73il@gmail.com/T/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By default FUSE would issue a flush before the release of a file |
|
|
|
By default, FUSE would issue a flush before the release of a file |
|
|
|
descriptor. This was considered a bit aggressive and a feature added |
|
|
|
to give the FUSE server the ability to choose when that happens. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -1000,14 +1000,14 @@ value. |
|
|
|
1) if no errors: return 0 (success) |
|
|
|
2) return first error |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Older version of mergerfs would return success if any success occurred |
|
|
|
Older versions of mergerfs would return success if any success occurred |
|
|
|
but for unlink and rmdir there are downstream assumptions that, while |
|
|
|
not impossible to occur, can confuse some software. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For search functions there is always a single thing acted on and as |
|
|
|
For search functions, there is always a single thing acted on and as |
|
|
|
such whatever return value that comes from the single function call is |
|
|
|
returned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ distros are below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Debian installs are of a stable branch and therefore do not have |
|
|
|
the most up to date software. While mergerfs is available via `apt` it |
|
|
|
is suggested that uses install the most recent version available from |
|
|
|
is suggested that users install the most recent version available from |
|
|
|
the [releases page](https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs/releases). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### prebuilt deb |
|
|
@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ sudo apt install -y mergerfs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Ubuntu installs are of a stable branch and therefore do not have |
|
|
|
the most up to date software. While mergerfs is available via `apt` it |
|
|
|
is suggested that uses install the most recent version available from |
|
|
|
is suggested that users install the most recent version available from |
|
|
|
the [releases page](https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs/releases). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### prebuilt deb |
|
|
@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ users: https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs/releases |
|
|
|
branches should be considered works in progress. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First get the code from [github](https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs). |
|
|
|
First, get the code from [github](https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
$ git clone https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs.git |
|
|
@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ because mergerfs is no longer part of the workflow. Keep in mind that |
|
|
|
this also means certain mergerfs features that work by interrupting |
|
|
|
the read/write workflow, such as `moveonenospc`, will no longer work. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also understand that this will only work on dynamically linked |
|
|
|
Also, understand that this will only work on dynamically linked |
|
|
|
software. Anything statically compiled will not work. Many GoLang and |
|
|
|
Rust apps are statically compiled. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -1475,11 +1475,11 @@ to enable `dropcacheonclose` regardless of caching mode in order to |
|
|
|
minimize buffer bloat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is difficult to balance memory usage, cache bloat & duplication, |
|
|
|
and performance. Ideally mergerfs would be able to disable caching for |
|
|
|
and performance. Ideally, mergerfs would be able to disable caching for |
|
|
|
the files it reads/writes but allow page caching for itself. That |
|
|
|
would limit the FUSE overhead. However, there isn't a good way to |
|
|
|
achieve this. It would need to open all files with O_DIRECT which |
|
|
|
places limitations on the what underlying filesystems would be |
|
|
|
places limitations on what the underlying filesystems would be |
|
|
|
supported and complicates the code. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kernel documentation: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/fuse-io.txt |
|
|
@ -1549,7 +1549,7 @@ creates because the available space won't be updated for that time. |
|
|
|
As of version 4.20 Linux supports symlink caching. Significant |
|
|
|
performance increases can be had in workloads which use a lot of |
|
|
|
symlinks. Setting `cache.symlinks=true` will result in requesting |
|
|
|
symlink caching from the kernel only if supported. As a result its |
|
|
|
symlink caching from the kernel only if supported. As a result it's |
|
|
|
safe to enable it on systems prior to 4.20. That said it is disabled |
|
|
|
by default for now. You can see if caching is enabled by querying the |
|
|
|
xattr `user.mergerfs.cache.symlinks` but given it must be requested at |
|
|
@ -1690,9 +1690,9 @@ both against your normal setup, a singular branch, and with |
|
|
|
# BENCHMARKING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filesystems are complicated. They do many things and many of those are |
|
|
|
interconnected. Additionally, the OS, drivers, hardware, etc. all can |
|
|
|
interconnected. Additionally, the OS, drivers, hardware, etc. can all |
|
|
|
impact performance. Therefore, when benchmarking, it is **necessary** |
|
|
|
that the test focus as narrowly as possible. |
|
|
|
that the test focuses as narrowly as possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For most throughput is the key benchmark. To test throughput `dd` is |
|
|
|
useful but **must** be used with the correct settings in order to |
|
|
@ -1704,7 +1704,7 @@ representative of the device's true performance. |
|
|
|
When benchmarking through mergerfs ensure you only use 1 branch to |
|
|
|
remove any possibility of the policies complicating the |
|
|
|
situation. Benchmark the underlying filesystem first and then mount |
|
|
|
mergerfs over it and test again. If you're experience speeds below |
|
|
|
mergerfs over it and test again. If you're experiencing speeds below |
|
|
|
your expectation you will need to narrow down precisely which |
|
|
|
component is leading to the slowdown. Preferably test the following in |
|
|
|
the order listed (but not combined). |
|
|
@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ investigate further. |
|
|
|
Sometimes the problem is really the application accessing or writing |
|
|
|
data through mergerfs. Some software use small buffer sizes which can |
|
|
|
lead to more requests and therefore greater overhead. You can test |
|
|
|
this out yourself by replace `bs=1M` in the examples below with `ibs` |
|
|
|
this out yourself by replacing `bs=1M` in the examples below with `ibs` |
|
|
|
or `obs` and using a size of `512` instead of `1M`. In one example |
|
|
|
test using `nullrw` the write speed dropped from 4.9GB/s to 69.7MB/s |
|
|
|
when moving from `1M` to `512`. Similar results were had when testing |
|
|
@ -1806,10 +1806,9 @@ echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches |
|
|
|
* Some policies mixed with some functions may result in strange |
|
|
|
behaviors. Not that some of these behaviors and race conditions |
|
|
|
couldn't happen outside **mergerfs** but that they are far more |
|
|
|
likely to occur on account of the attempt to merge together multiple |
|
|
|
sources of data which could be out of sync due to the different |
|
|
|
policies. |
|
|
|
* For consistency its generally best to set **category** wide policies |
|
|
|
likely to occur on account of the attempt to merge multiple sources |
|
|
|
of data which could be out of sync due to the different policies. |
|
|
|
* For consistency it's generally best to set **category** wide policies |
|
|
|
rather than individual **func**'s. This will help limit the |
|
|
|
confusion of tools such as |
|
|
|
[rsync](http://linux.die.net/man/1/rsync). However, the flexibility |
|
|
@ -1908,7 +1907,7 @@ you're having troubles with and asking them to add a fallback to |
|
|
|
regular file IO when mmap is unavailable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the issue is that scanning doesn't seem to pick up media then be |
|
|
|
sure to set `func.getattr=newest` though generally a full scan will |
|
|
|
sure to set `func.getattr=newest`, though generally, a full scan will |
|
|
|
pick up all media anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -1956,7 +1955,7 @@ move files around on that SMB share to fail with a IO error. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GVFS-fuse v1.22.0](https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734568) |
|
|
|
and above fixed this issue but a large number of systems use the older |
|
|
|
release. On Ubuntu the version can be checked by issuing `apt-cache |
|
|
|
release. On Ubuntu, the version can be checked by issuing `apt-cache |
|
|
|
showpkg gvfs-fuse`. Most distros released in 2015 seem to have the |
|
|
|
updated release and will work fine but older systems may |
|
|
|
not. Upgrading gvfs-fuse or the distro in general will address the |
|
|
@ -1964,7 +1963,7 @@ problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Apple's MacOSX 10.9 they replaced Samba (client and server) with |
|
|
|
their own product. It appears their new client does not handle |
|
|
|
**EXDEV** either and responds similar to older release of gvfs on |
|
|
|
**EXDEV** either and responds similarly to older releases of gvfs on |
|
|
|
Linux. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -2003,7 +2002,7 @@ compatible with older systems which may not have C++11 |
|
|
|
compilers. There is enough storage for 256 users' supplemental |
|
|
|
groups. Each user is allowed up to 32 supplemental groups. Linux >= |
|
|
|
2.6.3 allows up to 65535 groups per user but most other *nixs allow |
|
|
|
far less. NFS allowing only 16. The system does handle overflow |
|
|
|
far less. NFS allows only 16. The system does handle overflow |
|
|
|
gracefully. If the user has more than 32 supplemental groups only the |
|
|
|
first 32 will be used. If more than 256 users are using the system |
|
|
|
when an uncached user is found it will evict an existing user's cache |
|
|
@ -2052,7 +2051,7 @@ with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It should be noted that NFS and FUSE (the technology mergerfs uses) do |
|
|
|
not work perfectly with one another due to certain design choices in |
|
|
|
FUSE (and mergerfs.) Due to these issues it is generally recommended |
|
|
|
FUSE (and mergerfs.) Due to these issues, it is generally recommended |
|
|
|
to use SMB when possible till situations change. That said mergerfs |
|
|
|
should generally work as an export of NFS and issues discovered should |
|
|
|
still be reported. |
|
|
@ -2072,7 +2071,7 @@ NFS export settings: |
|
|
|
`open_by_handle_at` functions which allow a program to keep a |
|
|
|
reference to a file without technically having it open in the typical |
|
|
|
sense. The problem is that FUSE has no way to know that NFS has a |
|
|
|
handle that it will later use to open the file again. As a result it |
|
|
|
handle that it will later use to open the file again. As a result, it |
|
|
|
is possible for the kernel to tell mergerfs to forget about the node |
|
|
|
and should NFS ever ask for that node's details in the future it would |
|
|
|
have nothing to respond with. Keeping nodes around forever is not |
|
|
@ -2102,7 +2101,7 @@ permission and ownership issues if root squashing is enabled. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[SMB](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Message_Block) is a |
|
|
|
protocol most used by Microsoft Windows systems to share file shares, |
|
|
|
printers, etc. However, due to the popularity for Windows, it is also |
|
|
|
printers, etc. However, due to the popularity of Windows, it is also |
|
|
|
supported on many other platforms including Linux. The most popular |
|
|
|
way of supporting SMB on Linux is via the software Samba. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -2110,7 +2109,7 @@ way of supporting SMB on Linux is via the software Samba. |
|
|
|
ways of serving Linux filesystems, via SMB should work fine with |
|
|
|
mergerfs. The services do not tend to use the same technologies which |
|
|
|
NFS uses and therefore don't have the same issues. There should not be |
|
|
|
an special settings required to use mergerfs with Samba. However, |
|
|
|
special settings required to use mergerfs with Samba. However, |
|
|
|
[CIFSD](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIFSD) and other programs have |
|
|
|
not been extensively tested. If you use mergerfs with CIFSD or other |
|
|
|
SMB servers please submit your experiences so these docs can be |
|
|
@ -2251,7 +2250,7 @@ is to consolidate them back. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### What settings should I use? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depends on what features you want. Generally speaking there are no |
|
|
|
Depends on what features you want. Generally speaking, there are no |
|
|
|
"wrong" settings. All settings are performance or feature related. The |
|
|
|
best bet is to read over the available options and choose what fits |
|
|
|
your situation. If something isn't clear from the documentation please |
|
|
@ -2285,7 +2284,7 @@ you'll need to perform the manual act of creating paths on the |
|
|
|
filesystems you want the data to land on before transferring your |
|
|
|
data. Setting `func.mkdir=epall` can simplify managing path |
|
|
|
preservation for `create`. Or use `func.mkdir=rand` if you're |
|
|
|
interested in just grouping together directory content by filesystem. |
|
|
|
interested in just grouping directory content by filesystem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Do hardlinks work? |
|
|
@ -2334,7 +2333,7 @@ Keep in mind that you **MUST** consider identity when using |
|
|
|
containers. For example: supplemental groups will be picked up from |
|
|
|
the container unless you properly manage users and groups by sharing |
|
|
|
relevant /etc files or by using some other means to share identity |
|
|
|
across containers. Similarly if you use "rootless" containers and user |
|
|
|
across containers. Similarly, if you use "rootless" containers and user |
|
|
|
namespaces to do uid/gid translations you **MUST** consider that while |
|
|
|
managing shared files. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -2387,7 +2386,7 @@ container platforms such as Docker. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Why use FUSE? Why not a kernel based solution? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As with any solutions to a problem there are advantages and |
|
|
|
As with any solution to a problem, there are advantages and |
|
|
|
disadvantages to each one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A FUSE based solution has all the downsides of FUSE: |
|
|
@ -2428,8 +2427,8 @@ permissions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Why was splice support removed? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After a lot of testing over the years splicing always appeared to be |
|
|
|
at best provide equivalent performance and in cases worse |
|
|
|
After a lot of testing over the years, splicing always appeared to |
|
|
|
at best, provide equivalent performance, and in some cases, worse |
|
|
|
performance. Splice is not supported on other platforms forcing a |
|
|
|
traditional read/write fallback to be provided. The splice code was |
|
|
|
removed to simplify the codebase. |
|
|
@ -2451,7 +2450,7 @@ removed to simplify the codebase. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Can filesystems be written to directly? Outside of mergerfs while pooled? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, however it's not recommended to use the same file from within the |
|
|
|
Yes, however, it's not recommended to use the same file from within the |
|
|
|
pool and from without at the same time (particularly |
|
|
|
writing). Especially if using caching of any kind (cache.files, |
|
|
|
cache.entry, cache.attr, cache.negative_entry, cache.symlinks, |
|
|
@ -2505,9 +2504,9 @@ You can remove the reserve by running: `tune2fs -m 0 <device>` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When file caching is enabled in any form (`cache.files!=off`) it will |
|
|
|
issue `getxattr` requests for `security.capability` prior to *every |
|
|
|
single write*. This will usually result in a performance degradation, |
|
|
|
single write*. This will usually result in performance degradation, |
|
|
|
especially when using a network filesystem (such as NFS or SMB.) |
|
|
|
Unfortunately at this moment the kernel is not caching the response. |
|
|
|
Unfortunately at this moment, the kernel is not caching the response. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To work around this situation mergerfs offers a few solutions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -2524,7 +2523,7 @@ To work around this situation mergerfs offers a few solutions. |
|
|
|
forwarded to mergerfs. The downside is that also means the xattr |
|
|
|
based config and query functionality won't work either. |
|
|
|
4. Disable file caching. If you aren't using applications which use |
|
|
|
`mmap` it's probably simpler to just disable it all together. The |
|
|
|
`mmap` it's probably simpler to just disable it altogether. The |
|
|
|
kernel won't send the requests when caching is disabled. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -2538,7 +2537,7 @@ and if it returns **0** then it will |
|
|
|
race condition but it doesn't handle other situations. Rather than |
|
|
|
attempting to simulate POSIX ACL behavior the proper way to manage |
|
|
|
this is to use [seteuid](http://linux.die.net/man/2/seteuid) and |
|
|
|
[setegid](http://linux.die.net/man/2/setegid), in effect becoming the |
|
|
|
[setegid](http://linux.die.net/man/2/setegid), in effect, becoming the |
|
|
|
user making the original call, and perform the action as them. This is |
|
|
|
what mergerfs does and why mergerfs should always run as root. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -2550,7 +2549,7 @@ thread only. Jumping back to **root** as necessary should escalated |
|
|
|
privileges be needed (for instance: to clone paths between |
|
|
|
filesystems). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For non-Linux systems mergerfs uses a read-write lock and changes |
|
|
|
For non-Linux systems, mergerfs uses a read-write lock and changes |
|
|
|
credentials only when necessary. If multiple threads are to be user X |
|
|
|
then only the first one will need to change the processes |
|
|
|
credentials. So long as the other threads need to be user X they will |
|
|
@ -2667,7 +2666,7 @@ There are a lot of misc differences between the two projects but most |
|
|
|
features in DrivePool can be replicated with external tools in |
|
|
|
combination with mergerfs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally DrivePool is a closed source commercial product vs |
|
|
|
Additionally, DrivePool is a closed source commercial product vs |
|
|
|
mergerfs a ISC licensed OSS project. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|